Weave technologies reflection

From razwiki
Revision as of 12:24, 9 August 2023 by Razzi (talk | contribs) (Created page with "If I were to make weave again, I'd definitely make the application functional without javascript. That's probably the biggest change, and it'd be end user facing. Other than...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

If I were to make weave again, I'd definitely make the application functional without javascript. That's probably the biggest change, and it'd be end user facing.

Other than that, I'm realizing that many of the hot new technology choices I was making are a hassle to maintain. I started the project in 2018, and it's now 5 years later. Here are some of the technologies I used and how they've fared:

Python - ok flask - too minimal even for a small app, had to import and configure tons of packages pipenv - just a mediocre design, so many workaround and bespoke configurations. Better to use standard pip or poetry nodejs - ecosystem moves very fast postgres - solid linux - of course heroku - good short term, bad long term email - whatever image hosting - prefer to do this on disk task scheduling - didn't implement this, led to some subpar implementations ui - react is ok, ended up looking pretty slick, but js as a requirement isn't great css - would have saved a lot of effort to use a framework. The ecosystem is in such a state of flux though, basic css is actually fine